Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Smith v. Forrest County Board of Supervisors et al
as 2:2019cv00009
Plaintiff:
Cedric Fitzgerald Smith, Jr.
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Sheriff Billy Magee, Capt. Unknown McLamore, Forrest County Board of Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. USA
as 1:2018cv00144
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeremi Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Underwood v. Hattiesburg Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv00168
Plaintiff:
Rico Curtis Underwood
Defendant:
Hattiesburg Police Department, J Harrison, B. Nix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Board of Supervisors, Hinds County et al
as 3:2017cv00506
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lewis
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors, Hinds County, Hinds County, Mary Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogleman v. Three Rivers Towing et al
as 1:2016cv00186
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shane Fogleman
Defendant:
Three Rivers Towing, John Does I-X and Jerry Allen, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackston v. Alexander et al
as 3:2016cv00407
Plaintiff:
Victoria Monique Blackston
Defendant:
Tara Alexander and Jeremy Pollard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Adams County, Mississippi et al
as 5:2016cv00034
Plaintiff:
Charles Leavell Hamilton
Defendant:
Adams County, Mississippi, Adams County Sheriff's Office, Travis Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fogleman v. Okaloosa County Pre-Trial Services et al
as 1:2016cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jeremy S. Fogleman
Defendant:
Okaloosa County Pre-Trial Services and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Blackmon
as 3:2016cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Williams
Defendant:
B. E. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Fogleman v. O'Daniels et al
as 1:2016cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Shane Fogleman
Defendant:
Roy O'Daniels, Family Auto Wholesale and John Does I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
