Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Council v. State of Mississippi
as 2:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hinton Council
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Walls v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2008cv01483
Plaintiff:
Willie Joe Walls
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Cono Caranna and Lisa Dodson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BANKS v. BRATCHER et al
as 5:2008cv00252
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Banks
Defendant:
BRATCHER, WRIGHT, MUCUTCHAN and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plummer v. Roberts et al
as 4:2008cv00033
Plaintiff:
Johnny Plummer
Defendant:
Larry E. Roberts, Veldore Young and Lisa Howell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moore v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00262
Plaintiff:
Garry Moore
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Haley Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00261
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Harris
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Mississippi Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. King et al
as 2:2007cv00259
Plaintiff:
Singleton
Defendant:
Ron King, Christopher Epps, Lisa Herdan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steward et al v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00184
Plaintiff:
James Steward, Jimmy Harris and Garry Moore
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Mississippi Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Virgil v. Copiah County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2007cv00181
Plaintiff:
Robert Virgil
Defendant:
Copiah County Sheriff's Department, City of Hazlehurst Police Dept., Southwest Mississippi Narcotics Unit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
