Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Campbell v. Sollie
as 3:2023cv03035
Plaintiff:
Rikarion Campbell
Defendant:
William Bill Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barnett v. Pike County Circuit Court et al
as 5:2020cv00137
Defendant:
Fred Gordon, D. Smith, Clerk Roger Graves and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Keith Barnett
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayden v. Sollie
as 3:2019cv00187
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Owen Michael Hayden, III
Defendant:
Bill Sollie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gray v. Bryant et al
as 1:2018cv00152
Plaintiff:
David Gray
Defendant:
Phil Bryant, Jim Hood, Brian Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Lamar County Justice Court et al
as 2:2014cv00084
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Simmons
Defendant:
Lamar County Justice Court, Bill Anderson, Danny Regal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Graves et al
as 3:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
Bobby Keith Barnett
Defendant:
Roger A. Graves, Mike Smith, C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Graves et al
as 5:2014cv00043
Plaintiff:
Bobby Keith Barnett
Defendant:
Roger A. Graves, Mike Smith, C.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patton v. Bryant et al
as 3:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Edgar Patton
Defendant:
Phillip "Phil" Bryant, Randal Thomas, Michael "Mike" Howie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calderon v. State of Florida et al
as 5:2010cv00068
Plaintiff:
Juan Calderon
Defendant:
State of Florida, Bill McCollum and Dava J. Tums
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crook v. Cook et al
as 2:2009cv00206
Plaintiff:
Wilbert Crook
Defendant:
Tommy Cook, Synorous Green, Ed Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
