Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Chappell v. Haley
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Grady Eugene Chappell
Defendant:
Matt Haley
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Haley v. Brewer et al
as 1:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Russell Francis Haley
Defendant:
Franklin Brewer and Eddie Rogers
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haley v. Brewer
as 3:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Russell Haley
Defendant:
Franklin Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logan v. Mississippi Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00035
Defendant:
Mississippi Dept of Corrections, John Doe, Haley Barbour and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haley v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2018cv00407
Plaintiff:
Russell Haley
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 5:2017cv00119
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant:
Haley R. Barbour, Timothy H. Jones, Ricky L. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Logan v. Barbour et al
as 5:2015cv00080
Plaintiff:
Courtney R. Logan
Defendant:
Haley Barbour, Christopher Epps, Jody Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne v. ACA et al
as 3:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
David E. Payne
Defendant:
ACA, M.D.O.C., Ronald Reid Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. 2255 Haley Barbour Parkway et al
as 5:2011cv00048
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
2255 Haley Barbour Parkway, John Does 1-50 and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thomas v. 2255 Haley Barbour Parkway et al
as 5:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
2255 Haley Barbour Parkway, John Does 1-50 and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
