Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Johnson et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00580
Plaintiff:
James Johnson and All Plaintiffs
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Bechtel National, Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
White v. Epps et al
as 2:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
Tommy White, Sr.
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Ronald King, James Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
White v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv00305
Plaintiff:
Tommy White, Sr.
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, S.M.C.I. 2, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Johnson et al
as 2:2007cv00241
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen
Defendant:
James Johnson, Woodall, Hattley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockett v. King et al
as 2:2007cv00229
Plaintiff:
Carl Daniel Lockett
Defendant:
Ronald King, James Johnson, Hubbard Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Badger v. Epps et al
as 2:2007cv00197
Plaintiff:
Leroy Badger
Defendant:
Christopher B Epps, Ronald King, James Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Johnson et al
as 2:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
John Terrell
Defendant:
James Johnson, Ronald King, Jason Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sivori v. Epps et al
as 2:2007cv00079
Plaintiff:
Frank Sivori
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Christopher Epps, Emmit Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Paul Grahame Morgan
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, State of Mississippi, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
