Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Barnett v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00378
Plaintiff:
Corey Barnett
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Norris Hogans, Richard Cooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald et al v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00370
Plaintiff:
Benjamin D. McDonald, Joshua M. Lofton, Jacob Champion and others
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, Victor Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Mississippi Department of Corrections
as 1:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Corey Leon Rankins
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections and Alicia Box
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnett v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Corey Barnett
Defendant:
Frank Shaw, Norris Hogans, Unknown Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Peterson et al
as 1:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Corey Devon Jackson
Defendant:
Troy Peterson, Evan Hubard, Tony Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Hinds County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dion Morris
Defendant:
Hinds County Board of Supervisors, Hinds County Sheriff's Department, All Defendants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Turner et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Corey O'Neil Chatman
Defendant:
Unknown Turner, Katherine Blount, Joe Errington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rankins v. Ms. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv00419
Plaintiff:
Corey Leon Rankins
Defendant:
Ms. Dept. of Corrections and Alicia Box
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron v. Rushing et al
as 3:2016cv00857
Plaintiff:
Aaron James Aaron
Defendant:
Mary Rushing, Unknown Corey, Raven Dabbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chatman v. Parks et al
as 3:2016cv00812
Plaintiff:
Corey Oneil Chatman
Defendant:
Parks, Fillyaw, Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
