Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Sipp v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv00970
Plaintiff:
Herman Sipp
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Longino v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv00705
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Longino
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jordan v. Epps et al
as 4:2006cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Jordan and Kelvin Jordan
Defendant:
Christopher Epps and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Powers v. Epps et al
as 2:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
Stephen Elliot Powers
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Christopher B. Epps, Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
McNeal v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv00689
Plaintiff:
William C. McNeal
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ivy v. Kelly
as 4:2007cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Ivy
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv00559
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Epps et al
as 2:2007cv00049
Plaintiff:
Xavier Brown and Xavier Brown
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps, Christopher B. Epps, Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Jones v. Kelly
as 1:2007cv00545
Plaintiff:
Larry Jones
Defendant:
Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myles v. Mississippi State Of
as 3:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
John Roland Myles
Defendant:
Mississippi State Of and Lawrence Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
