Cases 51 - 60 of 4,570
Beckham v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02052
Petitioner:
Kevin Eugene Beckham, III
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ransom v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02058
Petitioner:
Clarence Michael Ransom
Respondent:
Warden D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Roberts v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02078
Petitioner:
Joseph Orlando Roberts
Respondent:
Katrina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bynum v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02049
Petitioner:
Adrian Bynum
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Case Opened in Error
as 5:2024hc02079
Defendant:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grissett v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02038
Petitioner:
Richard Hugh Grissett
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024hc02048
Petitioner:
Chris Shawn Williams and Christopher Shawn Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Middleton v. Kelly
as 5:2024hc02066
Petitioner:
Lamar Middleton
Respondent:
Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hayden v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02045
Petitioner:
Triniece Nathael Hayden
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lozano-Bustos v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02036
Petitioner:
William Lozano-Bustos
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
