Cases 61 - 70 of 4,572
Cannon v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02053
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Cannon
Respondent:
Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankin v. McManus
as 5:2024hc02051
Petitioner:
Shurod Rankin
Respondent:
Shawn McManus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beckham v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02052
Petitioner:
Kevin Eugene Beckham, III
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02050
Petitioner:
Hadie Markeith Jones
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Defendant:
Warden Basden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bynum v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02049
Petitioner:
Adrian Bynum
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024hc02048
Petitioner:
Chris Shawn Williams and Christopher Shawn Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Belvin v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02046
Petitioner:
Frederick Belvin
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hayden v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02045
Petitioner:
Triniece Nathael Hayden
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Livingston v. Scarantino
as 5:2024hc02044
Petitioner:
Cedric Livingston
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baca v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02043
Petitioner:
Damien Anthony Baca
Respondent:
Warden D. Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
