Cases 71 - 80 of 4,614
Williams v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02081
Petitioner:
Ritchie Williams
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hodge v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02075
Petitioner:
Robert L. Hodge
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blakney v. Garland et al
as 5:2024hc02067
Petitioner:
Larry Blakney
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lutz v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02082
Petitioner:
Joshua D. Lutz
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rangel Gonzales v. Rowe
as 5:2024hc02080
Petitioner:
Gloria Rangel Gonzales
Respondent:
Sheriff Willie Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ezeah v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02083
Petitioner:
Ken Ejimofor Ezeah
Respondent:
Warden K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
King v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02068
Petitioner:
Darnell William King
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2024hc02096
Petitioner:
Daryl Williams
Respondent:
JESSICA SAGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Tvrdy v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02084
Petitioner:
Jarod Steven Tvrdy
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Reagle
as 5:2024hc02095
Petitioner:
Oscar Perez
Respondent:
Christina Reagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
