Cases 1 - 10 of 4,561
Jones v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02107
Petitioner:
Rodney Moucell Jones
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heck v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02108
Petitioner:
Jeffery Stephen Heck
Respondent:
Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harper v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02109
Petitioner:
Terek Harper
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02106
Petitioner:
Antwarn Lee Rogers
Respondent:
Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bastas v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02105
Petitioner:
Andreas Peter Bastas
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ainscough v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02104
Petitioner:
Jared Ainscough
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bobbitt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02103
Petitioner:
Deon Patrick Bobbitt
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long v. Garland et al
as 5:2024hc02102
Petitioner:
James Long and James Robert Long
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Guin v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02076
Petitioner:
Charles Robert Guin, Jr.
Respondent:
North Carolina Adult Corrections and Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuller v. Rich
as 5:2024hc02100
Petitioner:
Ruben Fuller
Respondent:
Warden David Rich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
