Cases 91 - 100 of 2,550
Jordan v. Fly et al
as 5:2022ct03444
Plaintiff:
Malcolm A. Jordan
Defendant:
Jordan Fly, Mary Ann Baldwin, Wake County Municipality and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Batts v. Myers et al
as 5:2023ct03011
Plaintiff:
Clifton William Batts
Defendant:
Richard E. Myers, II, Sherri Horner Lawrence and Peter A. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zerby v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2022ct03443
Plaintiff:
Victor Charles Zerby
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Federal Medical Complex, Dr. Abrol Nayana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Copeland v. Mecklenburg County Jail et al
as 5:2022ct03460
Plaintiff:
John M Copeland
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Jail, Sheriff Garry McFadden, Medical Staff John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022ct03458
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03411
Plaintiff:
Raheem Latif Young
Defendant:
Sergeant Cooper and Robert Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03442
Plaintiff:
Charles Everette Hinton
Defendant:
Roy Cooper and State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Pellini
as 5:2022ct03390
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Wendell Ward
Defendant:
Kimberly D. Pellini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judd v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022ct03400
Plaintiff:
Dwight Judd
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Biden
as 5:2022ct03451
Plaintiff:
Brandon E. Thompson
Defendant:
President Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
