Cases 101 - 110 of 2,553
Rowland v. Pierce et al
as 5:2022ct03421
Plaintiff:
David L. Rowland, Jr.
Defendant:
Bonnie Pierce, Nationwide Insurance, Wake County Public Schools and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGriff El v. Bland et al
as 5:2022ct03423
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Lee McGriff El
Defendant:
Judge William Bland, Matthew Delbridge, Elaine Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Symmes v. NC Unemployment Office
as 5:2022cv00469
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Symmes, Jr.
Defendant:
NC Unemployment Office and NC Work Career Center of Rockingham County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmichael v. Chairperson of Publication Review Committee
as 5:2022ct03419
Plaintiff:
Quamine D. Carmichael and Quamaine Deshawn Carmichael
Defendant:
Chairperson of Publication Review Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Hill
as 5:2022ct03418
Plaintiff:
Solomon Nimrod Butler
Defendant:
Claire V. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 5:2022ct03417
Plaintiff:
Michael Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America and Federal Medical Center Butner North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Elrod v. B.O.P.
as 5:2022ct03413
Plaintiff:
Kevin Earl Elrod
Defendant:
B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Young v. Cooper et al
as 5:2022ct03411
Plaintiff:
Raheem Latif Young
Defendant:
Sergeant Cooper and Robert Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Judd v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022ct03400
Plaintiff:
Dwight Judd
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022ct03396
Plaintiff:
Quadius Nathaniel Gaines
Defendant:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
