Civil Rights Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina
Cases 31 - 40 of 70
James v. NC DPS Prisons et al
as 5:2016ct03325
Plaintiff: James J. James
Defendant: NC DPS Prisons, George T. Solomon, Hilary Hartford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03290
Plaintiff: Joseph Lee Perry
Defendant: Frank L. Perry, W. David Guice, George Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickens v. Perry et al
as 5:2016ct03189
Plaintiff: Brandon Michael Pickens
Defendant: Frank L. Perry, Robeson County, Brad Perritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. United States of America et al
as 5:2016ct03166
Plaintiff: Francis Brooks
Defendant: United States of America, Gerri Levister, S. Hollembaek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Askew v. Asbell et al
as 5:2016ct03159
Plaintiff: Norman Ben Askew
Defendant: Thomas E. Asbell, II, Dr. Lands, Paula Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sherrod et al v. Doe et al
as 5:2016ct03153
Plaintiff: Marion L. Sherrod and Jevon Monk
Defendant: John Doe, George T. Solomon, Superintendent Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Wallace et al
as 5:2016ct03148
Plaintiff: Nicholas Powell
Defendant: Blake Wallace, Duplin Co Jail's Medical Administrator, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yisrael v. McCrory et al
as 5:2016ct03128
Plaintiff: Ha Nasi Salut Vayi Yisrael
Defendant: Pat McCrory, Paul G. Butler, Jr., John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. McMahon et al
as 5:2016ct03075
Plaintiff: John Scott Hudson
Defendant: Ed McMahon, Jeffrey Rohena and John Doe Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avalos v. City of Chicago, Illinois et al
as 5:2015ct03321
Plaintiff: Carlos Avalos
Defendant: City of Chicago, Illinois, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harry D. Leinenweber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?