Cases 21 - 30 of 1,041
Broady v. International Paper Company
as 5:2023cv00726
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Broady
Defendant:
International Paper Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Edwards v. City of Raleigh
as 5:2023cv00683
Plaintiff:
Leo J. Edwards
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Henkel v. Scientific Calibration, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Kelly Henkel
Defendant:
Scientific Calibration, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Roberts v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv00636
Plaintiff:
Phillip Roberts
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. Rios et al
as 5:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Francisco Rosa Rios, Francisco Rosa Sterling, Fausto Omar Tejada-Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Dib v. F4L Sports, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Michael Dib
Defendant:
F4L Sports, Inc., Perk Fitness of Spring Lake, Inc., Fit4Life Franchising, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Haynes v. Advance Auto Parts, Incorporated
as 5:2023cv00585
Plaintiff:
Kara Haynes
Defendant:
Advance Auto Parts, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Littares v. TCOM, L.P.
as 4:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LITTARES
Defendant:
TCOM, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Littares v. TCOM, L.P.
as 2:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Christopher Littares
Defendant:
TCOM, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Davies v. Konica Minolta Healthcare Americas, Inc.
as 5:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Thomas Davies
Defendant:
KONICA MINOLTA HEALTHCARE AMERICAS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
