Cases 11 - 20 of 91
Campos Arroyo v. Lamm Farms, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00417
Plaintiff:
Axel Enrique Campos Arroyo
Defendant:
Lamm Farms, LLC, Real Constructions, LLC, Alvarado's Harvesting LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gonzalez v. United States of America et al
as 5:2023hc02163
Petitioner:
Armando Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America, Katina Howard and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Ray et al
as 5:2023ct03211
Plaintiff:
Robert Johnson
Defendant:
Bernard Ray, R. Gonzalez and David R. Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Noriega v. Scarantino
as 5:2023hc02126
Petitioner:
Marciano Gonzalez-Noriega
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jack Gonzalez
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Hernandez-Gonzalez v. Jones
as 5:2022hc02192
Petitioner:
Esteban Hernandez-Gonzalez
Respondent:
Timothy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gonzalez et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jack Gonzalez, William McDowell and Kathryn Pirnia
Defendant:
United States of America
Gonzalez et al v. United States of America
as 7:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jack Gonzalez, William McDowell and Kathryn Pirnia
Defendant:
United States of America
Gonzalez v. King et al
as 5:2022hc02140
Petitioner:
Alex Gonzalez
Respondent:
Malinda L. King and Collete S. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
