Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC v. Randolph Stair and Rail Company
as 5:2014cv00709
Movant:
Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC
Respondent:
Randolph Stair and Rail Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC v. Randolph Stairs
as 5:2014cv00715
Movant:
Weaver Cooke Construction, LLC
Respondent:
Randolph Stair and Rail Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCI Communications Services, Inc. et al v. Atlantic Telephone Membership Corporation et al
as 7:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
MCI Communications Services, Inc. and Verizon Select Services Inc.
Defendant:
Atlantic Telephone Membership Corporation, Carolina Telephone and Telegraph Company LLC, Central Telephone Company and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 222
Ledwell v. Randolph Correctional Center
as 5:2013ct03267
Plaintiff:
Billy Gene Ledwell
Defendant:
Randolph Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. McCoy
as 5:2013hc02167
Petitioner:
Randolph Wilson
Respondent:
Timothy McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arey v. Apker
as 5:2013hc02149
Petitioner:
Randolph William Arey
Respondent:
Craig Apker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Randolph v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, et al
as 4:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Anthony Randolph
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bowden v. USA
as 7:2012cv00213
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Evangelo Randolph Bowden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Randolph v. Levister
as 5:2012hc02160
Petitioner:
Antonio Martinelle Randolph
Respondent:
Gerri Levister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McNeill v. USA
as 5:2012cv00312
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randolph Lee McNeill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
