Cases 1 - 10 of 14
POWELL v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Traci Powell
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED, William Cook Europe ApS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GEE et al v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
as 1:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO GEE, BARRY WILLIAMS, DEWEY GOOLSBY and others
Defendant:
GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
STEWARD v. C.R. BARD, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00250
Defendant:
C.R. BARD, INC., BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM J. STEWARD and WILLIAM STEWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADE v. C R BARD INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00291
Defendant:
C R BARD INCORPORATED and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMSTEAD et al v. COLOPLAST CORP.
as 1:2019cv01000
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION and COLOPLAST CORP.
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ARMSTEAD, JR. and RITA ARMSTEAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRIMES v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
as 1:2017cv00466
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RANDOLPH GRIMES
Defendant:
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. OLYMPUS AMERICA, INC.
as 1:2017cv00098
Defendant:
OLYMPUS AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff:
CHANCE WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
WILLIAMS, ET AL v. REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, LLC.
as 1:2014cv01084
Plaintiff:
JOI WILLIAMS and FLOYD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELYA et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00868
Plaintiff:
LUCY ELYA , WILLIAM BERNARDO , ALFRED GILMORE and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BELL et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2010cv00874
Plaintiff:
VIRGIE BELL , JOANN BEVERLY , MELVIN D. CAMPBELL and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
