Cases 11 - 20 of 241
BROWN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01081
Plaintiff:
MARGARET J. BROWN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
KEATON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01073
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE FRANK KEATON, JR..
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BROWN v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01048
Plaintiff:
BARRY BROWN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MOORE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01046
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL L. MOORE
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DYE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01033
Plaintiff:
REBECCA B. DYE
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MERCER v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2012cv01024
Plaintiff:
KAY MERCER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ROY COOPER and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
DOWELL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01006
Plaintiff:
CAPRICE W. DOWELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JOHNSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00899
Plaintiff:
LORETTA FAYE JOHNSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
DANIELS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00889
Plaintiff:
MIASHAUN DANIELS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HOLCOMBE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00763
Plaintiff:
KATIE LOUISE HOLCOMBE
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
