Cases 101 - 110 of 2,178
SANDOVAL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Faustina Sandoval
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
MOODY v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00322
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CALVIN MOODY, III
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SSAOGCOMMS and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
SHELTON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00341
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S. SHELTON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MAYFIELD v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
JASON PAUL MAYFIELD
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
HAMPTON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00371
Plaintiff:
ANNETTE HAMPTON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
BEST v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL GAYLE BEST
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SSAOGCOMMS and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STANBACK v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00422
Plaintiff:
OLIVIA STANBACK
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
STATON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
KELLY STATON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CROTTS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
MONICA CROTTS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
TURMELLE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
KENNETH TURMELLE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
