Cases 11 - 20 of 36
SPAULDING v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
KI C. SPAULDING
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MILLER v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00948
Plaintiff:
DONNA C. MILLER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
MICHAILO v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00915
Plaintiff:
DONNA C MICHAILO
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
LONG, III v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00659
Plaintiff:
JOHN C. LONG, III
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FIELDS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00654
Plaintiff:
LORIANNE C. FIELDS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MCGREGOR v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01362
Plaintiff:
BRENDA C. MCGREGOR
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BITTNER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01181
Plaintiff:
EDMUND C. BITTNER, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
MCAULEY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01150
Plaintiff:
VERNON C. MCAULEY, JR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HOOD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00721
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL C HOOD
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
PESCE v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00486
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA C PESCE
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
