Cases 21 - 30 of 39
FISCHER v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00490
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. FISCHER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROUSE v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00359
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN E. ROUSE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
DAVIS v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00054
Plaintiff:
TONY E. DAVIS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SHAMBERGER v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv01021
Plaintiff:
GUY E SHAMBERGER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
DOBBIN v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00558
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. DOBBIN
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MCCAULEY v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00534
Plaintiff:
ALFRED E. MCCAULEY
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WILLIAMS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MCNATT v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv01221
Plaintiff:
JEROME E. MCNATT
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CHANEY v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00385
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CHANEY
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
DALLAS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00240
Plaintiff:
PATRICK E. DALLAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
