Cases 31 - 40 of 40
WILLIAMS v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00423
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL R. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MEYER-WILLIAMS v. COLVIN
as 1:2014cv00393
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MEYER-WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
MILLER v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00557
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. MILLER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WILLIAMS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
BRIAN E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
KELSO v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM JOSEPH KELSO
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PARKER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00746
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. PARKER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
CRUTCHFIELD v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv00439
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CRUTCHFIELD
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Hartsfeld et al
as 1:2008cv00878
Plaintiff:
William Hartsfeld and William Hartsfeld
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WILLIAMS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2008cv00805
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SECHLER v. ASTRUE
as 1:2008cv00621
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. SECHLER
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
