Cases 1 - 10 of 14
LAMAR v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
KEITH EDWARD LAMAR
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ELLERBEE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv01012
Plaintiff:
EDWARD LEVERNE ELLERBEE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
MILES v. KIJAKAZI et al
as 1:2022cv01116
Plaintiff:
RODERICK L. MILES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, MEREDITH TUCKER EDWARDS and BOB BOLLINGER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BALENTINE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00665
Plaintiff:
EDWARD A BALENTINE and EDWARD A. BALENTINE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BETHEA v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00822
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BETHEA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MARTIN v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00548
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
RICKY EDWARD MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BYERS v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
THOMAS EDWARD BYERS
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
POST v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01425
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. POST
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SHOOK v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv01237
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWARD SHOOK
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
EDWARDS v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00043
Plaintiff:
TOMMY EDWARDS
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
