Cases 1 - 10 of 14
BRIGGS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
DANNY K. BRIGGS
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
PLAYER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00092
Plaintiff:
JESSICA K. PLAYER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FERREBEE v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv01139
Plaintiff:
TINA K FERREBEE
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LOWE v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00742
Plaintiff:
MARTY K. LOWE
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
LESTER v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00759
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER K. LESTER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
JOYNER v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00259
Plaintiff:
BRENDA K. JOYNER
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BRANDON v. COLVIN
as 1:2013cv00051
Plaintiff:
BERNARD K. BRANDON
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
BORDWELL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv01096
Plaintiff:
CLINTON K. BORDWELL
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ROBINSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00940
Plaintiff:
JAMES K. ROBINSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested_party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
NICHOLSON v. ASTRUE
as 1:2010cv00532
Plaintiff:
SAMATHA K NICHOLSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
