Cases 171 - 180 of 225
SCHAEFFER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2008cv00817
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SCHAEFFER
Cause Of Action: Diversity
INTERRANTE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2008cv00818
Plaintiff:
MARIO INTERRANTE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LICIAGA v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2008cv00816
Plaintiff:
CARMEN LICIAGA
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RUSSELL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2008cv00815
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY M RUSSELL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COOLEY v. COKER, et al
as 1:2008cv00801
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. COOLEY
Defendant:
JULIA F. COKER, JOHN STOGDALE and JENNIFER C. STOGDALE
Cross Claimant:
JULIA F. COKER
Cross Defendant:
JOHN STOGDALE and JENNIFER C. STOGDALE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1452 Removal of Claim in Civil Action Related to BK. Case
RAMIREZ v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE
as 1:2008cv00780
Plaintiff:
LUCY RAMIREZ
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION d/b/a GLAXOSMITHKLINE
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MCCOY v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 1:2008cv00768
Plaintiff:
RACHEL MCCOY
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA, LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TALLEY v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, et al
as 1:2008cv00771
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE TALLEY
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA, LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BENNETT v. ASTRAZENECA, LP et al
as 1:2008cv00770
Plaintiff:
JOHN BENNETT
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA, LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOFFMEISTER v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, et al
as 1:2008cv00769
Plaintiff:
LORI ANNE HOFFMEISTER
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA, LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
