Cases 1 - 7 of 7
POTTER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
ZILDJIAN POTTER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA, LLC, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, MUTUAL OF OMAHA MORTGAGE, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA, LLC, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE v. HILLS
as 1:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA, LLC, SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE
Defendant:
CHRISTINA J HILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KELLIS v. U.S. BANK, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv00395
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. KELLIS
Defendant:
U.S. BANK, N.A. , FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
SIMMONS, et al v. TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00011
Plaintiff:
DAVIE D. SIMMONS and GERMAINE T. SIMMONS
Defendant:
TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA, LLC and CITIMORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MCGEE v. COUNTRYWIDE BANK FSB et al
as 1:2012cv00772
Plaintiff:
GERALD WILLIAM MCGEE
Defendant:
COUNTRYWIDE BANK FSB , BANC HOME LOAN SERVICING, LP , TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
CENTRAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al v. CAMPBELL
as 1:2012cv00287
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION and TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA LLC
Defendant:
ANTHONY CLAY CAMPBELL
Counter_claimant:
ANTHONY CLAY CAMPBELL
Counter_defendant:
CENTRAL MORTGAGE CORPORATION and TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BANK OF AMERICA INCORPORATED, et al v. CAMPBELL, et al
as 1:2012cv00269
Plaintiff:
BANK OF AMERICA INCORPORATED and TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA LLC
Defendant:
JIMMY TAYLOR CAMPBELL and JOYCE OSBORNE CAMPBELL
Counter_defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA INCORPORATED and TRUSTEE SERVICES OF CAROLINA'S
Counter_claimant:
JIMMY TAYLOR CAMPBELL and JOYCE OSBORNE CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
