Cases 31 - 39 of 39
BATEMAN v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00024
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. , AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. and JANE DOE
Plaintiff:
DAVID BATEMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
PRATT, et al v. MYLAN, INC., et al
as 1:2010cv00979
Defendant:
MYLAN, INC. , MYLAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TIM PRATT and JESSICA PRATT SMITH
Cause Of Action: Diversity
OWEN v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2010cv00837
Plaintiff:
BARRY THOMAS OWEN, JR.
Defendant:
TERRY S JOHNSON , B. J. BARNES , JOHN DOE (1) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEWIS v. DOES
as 1:2010cv00194
Plaintiff:
ROGER LEWIS
Defendant:
JOHN 1-10 DOES
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MAGERS v. MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC., et al
as 1:2010cv00126
Defendant:
MATRIXX INITIATIVES, INC. , BOTANICAL LABORATORIES, INC. , ZICAM, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
ROSANNE KIRSTEN MAGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MOSER v. PERSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2009cv00937
Plaintiff:
DANE R. MOSER
Defendant:
PERSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
KIA MOTORS CORPORATION, et al v. PREMIERE MOTORING CONCEPTS, L.L.C., et al
as 1:2008cv00802
Plaintiff:
KIA MOTORS CORPORATION, KIA MOTORS CORPORATION, KIA MOTORS CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
PREMIERE MOTORING CONCEPTS, L.L.C., DISTRIBUTION MAXIMUM AUTO DESIGN, INC., TECHNION MOTORS CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
STARLING v. HIGHER PRAISE, INC., et al
as 1:2008cv00602
Plaintiff:
JAMES STARLING
Defendant:
HIGHER PRAISE, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HINES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv00288
Plaintiff:
NANCY H. HINES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DOES 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
