Cases 31 - 40 of 87
WATSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv00209
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RURAL HEALTH GROUP, INC. and KELLY LYNNE PIEH-HOLDER, D.O.
Plaintiff:
SHATERIA SANDREA WATSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SMITH, ET AL.
as 1:2018cv00267
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HERSHAL SMITH, II and THE VILLAGE APOTHECARY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
TUGGLES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
VINCENT D. TUGGLES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SWEAT V. THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, ET AL.
as 1:2017cv01158
Plaintiff:
DELORES SWEAT
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. v. DUKE UNIVERSITY, et al.
as 1:2017cv00276
Plaintiff:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOSEPH M. THOMAS
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY , DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. , WILLIAM M. FOSTER, PH.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730
DOE et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv00183
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STEPHEN J. SICINSKI, KIM MCBROOM and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN DOE , ANN DOE , ELLEN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
WEITZMAN, M.D. v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
DAVID WEITZMAN, M.D.
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv01363
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOSEPHINE L. MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
AKERBERG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
JASON AKERBERG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
AKERBERG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2016cv01082
Plaintiff:
JASON AKERBERG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
