Cases 91 - 100 of 808
BRUEHL v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2021cv00590
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BRUEHL, M.D.
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
HOWARD-PRIESTER v. CAROLINA COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00492
Defendant:
ERICA LOCKLEAR and CAROLINA COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
SHAKEEMA HOWARD-PRIESTER
WADE v. JMJ ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00506
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY WADE
Defendant:
JMJ ENTERPRISES, LLC and TRACI JOHNSON MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
NOVANT HEALTH, INC. v. PERIMENIS
as 1:2021cv00526
Plaintiff:
NOVANT HEALTH, INC.
Defendant:
VASILIA PERIMENIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
TOWNES v. CELLULAR SALES SERVICES GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00499
Plaintiff:
ANDREA TOWNES
Defendant:
CELLULAR SALES OF NORTH CAROLINA, LLC and CELLULAR SALES SERVICES GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
DORVIT v. EAST PENN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2021cv00229
Defendant:
EAST PENN MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL DORVIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OVERMAN v. STOKES & FOLKS et al
as 1:2021cv00550
Plaintiff:
BRIAN OVERMAN
Defendant:
CLYDE P. STOKES and STOKES & FOLKS doing business as DOMINO'S PIZZA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LYLES v. HEANEY et al
as 1:2021cv00538
Defendant:
Tar Tiger Pizza, LLC, Sean T Heaney and SEAN T. HEANEY
Plaintiff:
Norman Lyles
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
NORRIS v. THE NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS GROUP BENEFITS PROGRAM
as 1:2021cv00419
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATIONS GROUP BENEFITS PROGRAM
Plaintiff:
LOURIA NORRIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RIVAS FERNANDEZ v. BLUESOURCE, LLC
as 1:2021cv00404
Defendant:
BLUESOURCE, LLC
Plaintiff:
EDUARDO RIVAS FERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
