Cases 151 - 160 of 808
TONEY v. B&G FOODS, INC.
as 1:2020cv00037
Defendant:
B&G FOODS, INC. and B&G FOODS SNACKS, INC.
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GRIMES and CHARITY TONEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
FRANCIS v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2020cv00011
Plaintiff:
HANNAH M. FRANCIS
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 77 v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2020cv00180
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 77
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
BLUMREICH v. AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1
as 1:2020cv00170
Defendant:
AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN NO. 1
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ERIC BLUMREICH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
JAMES v. PRS PARTNERS, LLC
as 1:2020cv00134
Defendant:
PRS PARTNERS, LLC
Plaintiff:
SIOBHAN JAMES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
QUIMBY-JOHNSON v. BORTREE et al
as 1:2020cv00131
Defendant:
JEREMY MCNEILL, QI SIGNS, LLC, MICHELE BORTREE and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN QUIMBY-JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
WALKER v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00040
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Plaintiff:
NANCY ELAINE WALKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
PELLIN v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2020cv00127
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
DAVID NORMAN PELLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
GRAY et al v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NC et al
as 1:2019cv01234
Defendant:
FRANK PAPA, FTI CONSULTING, INC, ERWIN BETTE and others
Plaintiff:
MONICA RANEY, TOMMY ELLIS, GARY HONBARGER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HENNINGS v. CIGNA CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv01202
Plaintiff:
TERESA HENNINGS
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA and CIGNA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
