Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 11 - 20 of 223
EVANS v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00375
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: KAREN EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
ROBERTS THOMAS v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00381
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: MARSHAUN ROBERTS THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00365
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: BRENDA CHRISTINE SMITH
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MCIVER v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00355
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: KEVIN MCIVER
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
PENDLETON v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00353
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: TAMMY NATIONS PENDLETON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
MILES v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00321
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: RODERICK L. MILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
FULP v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00310
Plaintiff: RICHARD O. FULP, JR.
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
BURNEY v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00304
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff: JAMES BURNEY
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CHILES II v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00303
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff: WAYNE DOUGLASS CHILES, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
SHAW v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00294
Plaintiff: LISA SHAW
Defendant: ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?