Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Cases 1 - 10 of 95
HARDEN v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00567
Plaintiff: DEANA GENISE HARDEN
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
PLAZAS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00562
Plaintiff: WILLIAM JAIME PLAZAS
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HILL v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00533
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Plaintiff: BRANDON HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
WILLIX v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00532
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: JENNIFER LYNN WILLIX
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BROWN v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00512
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: MELODY FAIRY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
AKELEY v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00505
Plaintiff: DEBRA JEAN AKELEY
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RAMOS v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00346
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: Edwin Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
WILLIAMS v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00328
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: LOIE ELIZABETH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
RICHMOND v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2021cv00326
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: JACKIE LYNN RICHMOND
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
EMERSON v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00307
Plaintiff: SONYA ODUM EMERSON
Interested Party: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant: ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?