Cases 1 - 10 of 10
LINGLE v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. LINGLE
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
BRANDI v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
TERRY BRANDI
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
PRICE v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2020cv00908
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ELDRIDGE PRICE
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIPSCOMB v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00940
Plaintiff:
Keith Lipscomb
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARBER v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2018cv00327
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARBER
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
STOUTENBURG v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00979
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E STOUTENBURG
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANEY v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2015cv00646
Plaintiff:
MARION HANEY
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, GROUP LIFE AND DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN OF NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL AND APPLICABLE AFFILIATES and NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
OBERLIN v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. OBERLIN
Defendant:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRYANT v. THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2011cv00976
Plaintiff:
SHARON BRYANT
Defendant:
THE STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
ROTH et al v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 1:2007mc00008
Plaintiff:
BONNIE L. ROTH and CONNIE S. ROTH
Defendant:
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and AMERICAN STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
