Cases 21 - 30 of 1,146
Littlejohn v. Hawkins
as 1:2024cv00073
Petitioner:
Jermaine Valgaue Littlejohn
Respondent:
Shanticia Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pippinger v. Buncombe County Government Complex
as 1:2024cv00030
Petitioner:
Jonathan Daniel Pippinger
Respondent:
Buncombe County Government Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Safrit v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
Matthew Aaron Safrit
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spann v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Spann
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Priest
as 5:2024cv00002
Petitioner:
Chad Edward Campbell
Respondent:
Pazavar Priest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bright v. Wood
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Rickey Bright
Respondent:
Chris Wood, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Black v. Cooper
as 3:2023cv00899
Petitioner:
Martinez Orlandis Black
Respondent:
Billy Cooper
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. Priest
as 3:2023cv00886
Petitioner:
Montavius Antoine Johnson
Respondent:
Pazavar Priest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martell v. USA
as 3:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Catina Lynn Martell
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Noonsab v. Ishee
as 1:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Somchai Noonsab
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
