Cases 1 - 10 of 1,720
Orr v. Cothron et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Eric Christopher Orr
Defendant:
David Cothron, Derek Price, Kevin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scroggs v. Compton et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Seth Reed Scroggs
Defendant:
J. Compton, R.A. Crow and Mooresville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grady v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff:
Tracey Terrell Grady
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, FNU Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowe et al v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Dominic A. Lowe, Eyan A. Moore and Pedro Marcelino
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, J. Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCants v. Harrison et al
as 5:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Travus McCants
Defendant:
Chum Harrison, FNU Woodard, FNU Nealy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Balfour v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Craig Balfour
Defendant:
David Miller and U.S. Customs and Border Patrol
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnette v. Eady-Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
Anuneakas Arsintchez Barnette
Defendant:
Karen Eady-Williams, Susan Surles, Garry McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pacheco v. Love et al
as 5:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Elijah E. Pacheco
Defendant:
Skyler Love, FNU Greene, Graylan Groce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Quinn et al
as 5:2024cv00125
Defendant:
FNU Starowicz, FNU Quinn, FNU Lay and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jeremy Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Iredell County et al
as 5:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Jason Myers White
Defendant:
Iredell County, Vincent Pandolpha and Bert Connelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
