Cases 131 - 140 of 464
ALI v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC.
as 2:2020cv03685
Plaintiff:
RAHIM ALI
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CUCALON et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. et al
as 2:2020cv01429
Plaintiff:
LINA ROCIO CABRERA and DANIEL CUCALON
Defendant:
J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC., J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT SERVICES, INC. and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CLARK v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2020cv00951
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and HALLCON CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
ALBERT CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VINCENT v. PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORPORATION (PATH)
as 2:2020cv00956
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY TRANS-HUDSON CORPORATION (PATH)
Plaintiff:
AMY VINCENT
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
LABBATE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.,
as 2:2019cv21388
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LABBATE
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.,
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
JEFFREY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 3:2019cv19949
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
PATRICK JEFFREY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CHUDZIK v. NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 3:2019cv19008
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CHUDZIK
Defendant:
NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
KRAMARAZ v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 3:2019cv19951
Plaintiff:
THEODORE KRAMARAZ
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
SHERIDAN v. PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK / NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2019cv16893
Defendant:
PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK / NEW JERSEY, PORT AUTHORITY TRANS HUDSON CORP., ABC CORP. 1-10 (fictitious entities) and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHERIDAN
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
CHUDZIK v. NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
as 2:2019cv19008
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CHUDZIK
Defendant:
NJ TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
