Cases 41 - 50 of 395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Amin v. Renaud et al
as 1:2021cv00818
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, ABC Agency 1-10, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Plaintiff:
JAYDUL AMIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00661
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hossain v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2021cv00267
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, Acting director Kevin Mccaleenan, Secretary Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
PARVEZ HOSSAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Khattri v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2020cv05953
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli, ABC Agency 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
PAWAN KHATTRI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rahaman v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv05897
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli, ABC Agency 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
Maksudur Rahaman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Simai v. Docsbackoffice.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05686
Plaintiff:
Dr. David Simai
Defendant:
John Does, 1-10 and Docsbackoffice.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
