Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Sage-El v. Power et al
as 1:2015cv07417
Defendant:
C.O. Alvares, Judge M Armstrong, J Campanelli and others
Plaintiff:
Sage-El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Powers v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2015cv05116
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, "John Doe #1", "John Doe #2" and others
Plaintiff:
John T. Powers, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05821
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gonzalez v. Hasty et al
as 1:2012cv05013
Defendant:
Captain Nelson Aponte, Inspector Barrere, Captain Barry and others
Plaintiff:
Esteban Gonzalez
The Independence Project, Inc. et al v. Leach & Powers LLC
as 2:2012cv03883
Defendant:
Leach & Powers LLC
Plaintiff:
Ronald Moore and The Independence Project, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Miller et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv05036
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Bynoe and Latoya Miller
Defendant:
City of New York, P.O. Cote, P.O. Ramon Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
