Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hicyilmaz v. Concord Mortgage et al
as 2:2023cv02668
Plaintiff:
Ayhan Hicyilmaz
Defendant:
Concord Mortgage, Bank of America N.A., The Bank of New York America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lovell v. L.I. Property Services Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv01330
Plaintiff:
Martin Lovell
Defendant:
L.I. Property Services Corporation, Neighborhood Assistance Corporation of America, Bank Of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Bank of America N.A.
as 1:2020cv03306
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Redd v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 2:2019cv01045
Defendant:
Sweeny, Gallo, Reich, & Bolz LLP, David Gallo, and Associates, "ETAL" and others
Plaintiff:
Fedie R. Redd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dekom v. Goldman Sachs & Co. et al
as 2:2018cv04078
Defendant:
Maureen O'Connell, Goldman Sachs & Co., Bank of America N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Dekom
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Palencia De Paz v. Hogar Mortgage and Financial Services, Inc et al
as 2:2017cv03037
Defendant:
Hogar Mortgage and Financial Services, Inc, EverBank, John Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Axel E Palencia De Paz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv06149
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01611
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
