Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kane v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2022cv03174
Plaintiff:
Nickie Kane
Defendant:
The State of New York, New York State Unified Court System, Tamara Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv06089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Wynter v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv02924
Defendant:
Unidentified Police Officers, Police Officer Marlene Welch and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wynter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Proctor v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2020cv01167
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Proctor
Defendant:
Tamara Sepper, Eric Gonzales, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peterkin v. Carr et al
as 1:2020cv00524
Defendant:
Tamara Williams, Brian E. Jones and Douglas Carr
Plaintiff:
Meuris Peterkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abdul-Malik v. Office of Court Administration et al
as 1:2018cv07361
Defendant:
Sherrill Spatz, Unified Court System for the 11th Judicial District, Francis Kenna, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Salim Abdul-Malik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06141
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794 Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05136
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
