Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Hernandez v. Sposato et al
as 2:2011cv06268
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe and Michael Sposato
Plaintiff:
Kevin Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Lee
as 2:2010cv04667
Petitioner:
Jose Hernandez
Respondent:
William Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Cuomo
as 1:2010cv04586
Defendant:
Andrew Cuomo
OBCC:
Benito Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ceparano v. Suffolk County, NY et al
as 2:2010cv02030
Defendant:
P.O. "John Doe's #'s 10-50", "Supervisor of Bradford S. Magill", "Supervisor of Patricia Brosco" and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony J. Ceparano
MADD:
Mother's Against Drunk Driving
Peeping Pervert:
Cathy Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hernandez v. Lempke
as 2:2010cv01791
Petitioner:
Marco Hernandez
Respondent:
John Lempke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez-Hernandez v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv04107
Petitioner:
Hernan Ramirez-Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bogle v. Melamed et al
as 1:2009cv01017
Plaintiff:
Gary Bogle
Defendant:
Joel Melamed, James A. McKenna, Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Kelly et al
as 1:2009cv01576
Plaintiff:
Hugo Hernandez
Defendant:
Raymond Kelly, McNamara, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00340
Petitioner:
Daniel Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
