Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Curry v. Annucci
as 1:2022cv05325
Petitioner:
John Curry
Respondent:
Patrick Reardon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01122
Plaintiff:
John Curry
Defendant:
State Of New York, Rodney Young, Ms. Charvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. Nassau County First Precinct Baldwin et al
as 2:2018cv01130
Defendant:
Michael Sierzant, Joseph Phibin, Sean Ledwith and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Nassau County Corr. Center et al
as 2:2018cv00979
Defendant:
Nassau County Correctional Facility and Nassau County Corr. Center
Plaintiff:
Ernest Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Valentine et al
as 1:2017cv01319
Plaintiff:
Michael Curry
Defendant:
Captain McDonald, Warden Scott and C.O. Valentine
Interested Party:
Office of the Corporation Counsel of the City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Currie v. Graham
as 2:2017cv01227
Plaintiff:
James E. Currie
Defendant:
Harold D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Conner et al v. Kira International, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
Richie H. Conner and Eunice Montgomery
Defendant:
Franklin Currie, Kira International Communications, LLC and Kira International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Curry v. Sposato et al
as 2:2012cv01031
Plaintiff:
Ernest Curry
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe and Michael Sposato
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Currie v. Laird
as 1:2007cv00369
Petitioner:
Damar Currie
Respondent:
Paul M. Laird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
