Cases 1 - 10 of 298
Wispe v. Toulon, Jr.
as 2:2024cv03799
Plaintiff:
Hernan Wispe
Defendant:
Errol D. Toulon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
DeFreitas v. Toulon Jr.
as 2:2024cv03394
Petitioner:
Russell DeFreitas
Respondent:
Errol D. Toulon Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
York v. King
as 1:2024cv02449
Petitioner:
Donnell D. York
Respondent:
M King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Footman v. Doherty et al
as 2:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Karon Footman
Defendant:
Dale Doherty, Jeffrey Foster, Errol D Toulon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. D. Barnes #823 et al
as 1:2024cv01186
Plaintiff:
David Richards
Defendant:
D. Barnes #823, Kim Salm Inmate Coordinator and Lieutenant Michael Slack #125
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Ber- Berlin FCI et al
as 1:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Jim Scott Cole
Defendant:
Ber- Berlin FCI, Team Quebec, N. Cairns- U/M and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Hilton et al
as 1:2023cv08955
Petitioner:
Ronald Williams
Respondent:
Dep. Hilton, D. Vennetozzi and M. Passage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cummings v. Larocco et al
as 2:2023cv08407
Plaintiff:
Carl D. Cummings
Defendant:
(Sheriff) Anthony Larocco, (Med.Director) Donna Henig and (Socail Worker) Ms. Vicktarelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
