Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv03826
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hale v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01992
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Hale
Defendant:
Merck & Co, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hale et al v. Zimmer, Inc., et al
as 1:2012cv05625
Plaintiff:
George Hale and Joyce W. Hale
Defendant:
Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products, Inc. and Zimmer, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Hale v. Merck & Company, Inc
as 1:2012cv03254
Plaintiff:
Leonard A Hale
Defendant:
Merck & Company, Inc and Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hale v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv03280
Defendant:
City of New York, Officer Jane Doe, Sergeant Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Janette Hale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Licopoli v. Mineola Union Free School District et al
as 2:2009cv03974
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Licopoli
Defendant:
Mineola Union Free School District, Laraine Salvatore, Terence Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv00910
Plaintiff:
Keenen Parker
Defendant:
The City of New York, N.Y.P.D., Charles Hynes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hale v. Graham
as 1:2008cv03607
Petitioner:
Michael Shane Hale
Respondent:
H.D. Graham
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hale v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2007cv00571
Plaintiff:
William Hale
Defendant:
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, U.S.A., Inc., Spinal Graft Technologies, LLC, Regeneration Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
