Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Cases 31 - 40 of 60
Stokes v. Ruiz et al
as 1:2012cv01726
Shield No. 2103: Christopher Held
Defendant: John and Jane Does and John Lydon
Shield No. 22875: Jose A. Ruiz
Plaintiff: Shawn Stokes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. $83, 948.00 formerly on deposit at Suntrust Bank Account Number Ending in 1426 Held in the name of SMT of America
as 1:2012cv01252
Defendant: $83, 948.00 formerly on deposit at Suntrust Bank Account Number Ending in 1426 Held in the name of SMT of America
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. $197,105.70 Seized from Bank of America Account Numbers Ending In 3344 and 3357 held in the Name of Transocean International Trading, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00192
Defendant: $197,105.70 Seized from Bank of America Account Numbers Ending In 3344 and 3357 held in the Name of Transocean International Trading, Inc.
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Gamez v. Court Room Part 41 et al Featured Case
as 1:2011cv06126
Defendant: All Defendants held accountable in their individual capacities, All Persons known and unknown within or not within goverment capacity, C.O. Saunderson of the Main Library at GMDC and others
Plaintiff: Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. All Funds Deposit At: Citibank Account No. 9985349522, held in the name of Shymnur Trade Inc., up to and including the sum of $799,500.92 et al
as 1:2011cv05264
Defendant: All Funds Deposit At: Citibank Account No. 9985349522, held in the name of Shymnur Trade Inc., up to and including the sum of $799,500.92, Bank of America Account No. 483024302437, held in the name of Nurken Nurgaliuly, up to and including the sum of $872.96; and, Bank of America Account No. 48303420439, held in the name of Shymnur Trade Inc., up to and including the sum of $885,547.19 and others
Intervenor: Kamil Kamzagaliyev
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Gamez v. Court Room Part 41 et al
as 1:2011cv05436
Defendant: All Defendants Held Accountable in Their Individual Capacities, P.O. Brisbain, Police Officer Carlson and others
Plaintiff: Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamez v. Court Room Part 41 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv04458
Defendant: All Defendants Held Accountable in Their Individual Capacities, All Persons Known and Unknown Within or Not Within Government Capacity, Court Room Part 41 and others
Plaintiff: Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamez v. The State and Municipality of NY the NYPD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv04457
Defendant: All Defendants Held Accountable in Their Individual Capacities, All Persons Known and Unknown Within or Not Within Government Capacity, D.O.C. Commands and others
Plaintiff: Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamez v. The State and Municipality of N.Y. et al
as 1:2011cv03374
Defendant: All Defendants Held Accountable in Their Individual Capacities, All Persons Known and Unknown Within or Not Within Government Capacity, D.O.C. and Commands and others
Plaintiff: Ricardo Brooks Gamez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Various Antiquities, Cultural Property, and Assets Held in the Name of or for the Benefit of Windsor Antiques and/or Mousa Khouli (a.k.a. "Morris Khouli")
as 1:2011cv02889
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Various Antiquities, Cultural Property, and Assets Held in the Name of or for the Benefit of Windsor Antiques and/or Mousa Khouli (a.k.a. "Morris Khouli")
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 3114 Motion for Return of Seized Property

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?