Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Exinvil v. U.S.A. et al
as 1:2011cv01131
Petitioner:
Antoine Exinvil
Respondent:
U.S.A. and Warden, Fort Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Surgeon v. United States Army Garrison Fort Hamilton et al
as 1:2011cv00460
Defendant:
Harvey O. Dornellian and United States Army Garrison Fort Hamilton
Plaintiff:
Latanya Surgeon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv05524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Reeves v. F.C.I. Fort Dix et al
as 1:2010cv02765
Defendant:
Mr. Batiste, F.C.I. Fort Dix, Captain Fitzgerald and others
Plaintiff:
Arnold Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chung v. Sano et al
as 1:2010cv02301
Plaintiff:
Jin Young Chung
Defendant:
Fort Lee Zaiya, Inc., Yoko Sano, Ikue Yosida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Williams v. Forte et al
as 1:2009cv02900
Plaintiff:
George E. Williams
Defendant:
Matthew Forte, John Does 1-5 and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Securities and Exchange Commission et al v. Forte et al
as 1:2009mc00199
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Defendant:
Joseph S. Forte and Joseph Forte, L.P.
Receiver:
Marion Hecht
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Williams v. The City of Bay Shore et al
as 2:2008cv04624
Plaintiff:
Damon Williams
Defendant:
The City of Bay Shore, The Suffolk County Police Dept., Daniel J. Coan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
