Cases 61 - 70 of 119
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lyons v. Town of Hempstead Urban Renewal et al
as 2:2018cv02055
Defendant:
Heather D. Crosley, Town of Hempstead Urban Renewal and Eric S. Rosenblum
Plaintiff:
Everage Lyons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01711
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Air Techniques, Inc. v. DentalEZ, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv01018
Defendant:
Louis D. Guellnitz, Donald Tomko, DentalEZ, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Air Techniques, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Air Techniques, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01018
Plaintiff:
Dentalez,Inc. d/b/a Dentalez Intergrated Solutions, Heather Trombley, Louis D,Guellnitz, Clayton Dean, Donald Tomko, and Lindsay Viola and Air Techniques, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv07595
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
