Cases 61 - 70 of 87
Dismal v. Lavalle
as 1:2011cv00085
Petitioner:
Wade Dismel
Respondent:
Lavalle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wade et al v. Law Office of Mark A. Carey et al
as 1:2010cv05900
Plaintiff:
Natasha Brown and John M. Wade
Defendant:
Mark Carey, John and Jane Does Numbers 1 through 25 and Law Office of Mark A. Carey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wade v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv05941
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Whetsel Wade
Cause Of Action: Motion for Return of Property
Wade v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv05727
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Whetsel Wade
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Phelps et al v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv05441
Plaintiff:
Wayne Phelps and Carolann Wade
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Wade v. Fischer et al
as 1:2010cv05417
Defendant:
Dennis Breslin, Brian Fischer, Correction Officer M. Recker and others
Plaintiff:
Okieto Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05157
Defendant:
City of New York and John Doe(s)
Plaintiff:
Uceff Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathon et al v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al
as 2:2010cv03664
Defendant:
Nancy C. Burlingame, Chase Fulfillment Center, Chase Home Finance LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Hank Mathon and Sheila Mathon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Phelps et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 1:2010cv03157
Plaintiff:
Wayne Phelps and Carolann Wade
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Watson et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 1:2009cv04265
Plaintiff:
Michael Watson, Ira Bard, Barbara Beam and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
