Cases 61 - 70 of 283
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv06176
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv05240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Walker v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv05046
Defendant:
Queens District Attorney, John Does, New York City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Rosetta Stone Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04641
Defendant:
Kathryn Eberle Walker, Laurence Franklin, Aedhmar Hynes and others
Plaintiff:
Bernadette Price
Pompey v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv04574
Plaintiff:
Rondall Pompey
Defendant:
John Roes 1-2, City of New York, John Doe 1-7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv04426
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Carmilita A. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Asapansa-Johnson Walker et al v. Azar II et al
as 1:2020cv02834
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services and Alex M. Azar II
Plaintiff:
Tanya Asapansa-Johnson Walker, Cecilia Gentili and House of Representatives
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Walker v. Osei et al
as 1:2020cv02514
Defendant:
Bright Point Health and Solomon Osei, M.D.
Plaintiff:
Junior Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Walker v. Royce
as 1:2020cv02386
Respondent:
Supt. Mark Royce
Petitioner:
Michael Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
